<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tenacious Search</title>
	<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 06:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by Fred Wood</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-412</link>
		<author>Fred Wood</author>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Feb 2007 17:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-412</guid>
		<description>Dear Igor &#38; colleagues:

Do you or others see any radarsat, landsat, or other imagery hits in the vicinity of 350 nautical miles northwest of the Farallon Islands at a compass heading of about 325 degrees magnetic?

This approximate location seems to align with some of the drift modeling, just based on eyeballing what has been posted.

Thank you for any correlation info you may have.

Pls feel free to email me direct as well as post.

Fred Wood, fbwood@hotmail.com, cell 703-615-4910</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Igor &amp; colleagues:</p>
<p>Do you or others see any radarsat, landsat, or other imagery hits in the vicinity of 350 nautical miles northwest of the Farallon Islands at a compass heading of about 325 degrees magnetic?</p>
<p>This approximate location seems to align with some of the drift modeling, just based on eyeballing what has been posted.</p>
<p>Thank you for any correlation info you may have.</p>
<p>Pls feel free to email me direct as well as post.</p>
<p>Fred Wood, <a href="mailto:fbwood@hotmail.com">fbwood@hotmail.com</a>, cell 703-615-4910</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by Fred Wood</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-409</link>
		<author>Fred Wood</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 23:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-409</guid>
		<description>Nice work Igor and others, in keeping the forward movement on imagery analysis and cross-correlation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice work Igor and others, in keeping the forward movement on imagery analysis and cross-correlation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by IgorCarron</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-406</link>
		<author>IgorCarron</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 16:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-406</guid>
		<description>With regards to multispectral data I just added some more evidence of the potential for using them:
http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html
in particular, since the clouds were so bad, it looks like only Feb 3 provided some good imagery:
http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html
in other words, it would provide a way of figuring out if any of the data of the drift model going south are legitimate items. I do not have access to landsat 7 images. I would guess that any remote sensing group working for the state of california would have a free access to those. The USGS route, not only involves payment but also a LONG delay as far as I recall.

Now, with regards to the other imagery:
astronaut acquired photographs:
http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-astronaut-acquired.html
my efforts have not yielded anything, so if somebody has an inside track there, please go ahead. My feedback has been that since the power went off on ISS this week-end and they are only three, very little activity could be unplanned.

With regards to Envisat (and the much coarser resolution), I do not have an inside track in that either and then there is the additional cloud issue:
http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-why-radar-should-be.html
yet I recall that Feb 12 yielded a less than 90 percent cloud cover. Once again, with multispectral data, we are really looking for high contrast detection, nothing like resolving the boat.

Igor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to multispectral data I just added some more evidence of the potential for using them:<br />
<a href="http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html</a><br />
in particular, since the clouds were so bad, it looks like only Feb 3 provided some good imagery:<br />
<a href="http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-result-of-search-on.html</a><br />
in other words, it would provide a way of figuring out if any of the data of the drift model going south are legitimate items. I do not have access to landsat 7 images. I would guess that any remote sensing group working for the state of california would have a free access to those. The USGS route, not only involves payment but also a LONG delay as far as I recall.</p>
<p>Now, with regards to the other imagery:<br />
astronaut acquired photographs:<br />
<a href="http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-astronaut-acquired.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-astronaut-acquired.html</a><br />
my efforts have not yielded anything, so if somebody has an inside track there, please go ahead. My feedback has been that since the power went off on ISS this week-end and they are only three, very little activity could be unplanned.</p>
<p>With regards to Envisat (and the much coarser resolution), I do not have an inside track in that either and then there is the additional cloud issue:<br />
<a href="http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-why-radar-should-be.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-why-radar-should-be.html</a><br />
yet I recall that Feb 12 yielded a less than 90 percent cloud cover. Once again, with multispectral data, we are really looking for high contrast detection, nothing like resolving the boat.</p>
<p>Igor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by Fools Gold</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-404</link>
		<author>Fools Gold</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2007 14:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-404</guid>
		<description>Query as "objects".

Some objects such as a demasted yacht would drift differently than seat cushions, styrofoam cups and the like. Ofcourse a satellite is not going to spot a styrofoam cup and any such object would not be susceptible of being linked to a particular source. Life preservers would float for a long time, seat cushions eventually would become water logged or might have been well lashed down.

If the yacht is not visible and debris is not visible, I can not believe the 12,000 volunteers searching the images all missed things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Query as &#8220;objects&#8221;.</p>
<p>Some objects such as a demasted yacht would drift differently than seat cushions, styrofoam cups and the like. Ofcourse a satellite is not going to spot a styrofoam cup and any such object would not be susceptible of being linked to a particular source. Life preservers would float for a long time, seat cushions eventually would become water logged or might have been well lashed down.</p>
<p>If the yacht is not visible and debris is not visible, I can not believe the 12,000 volunteers searching the images all missed things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by Felipe Oliveira</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-401</link>
		<author>Felipe Oliveira</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 19:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-401</guid>
		<description>just for example, i guess we can use this type of imaging to find tenacious...

http://earth.esa.int/images/INSI/IIB/ERS1_32466_ERS2_12793_333_621/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just for example, i guess we can use this type of imaging to find tenacious&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://earth.esa.int/images/INSI/IIB/ERS1_32466_ERS2_12793_333_621/" rel="nofollow">http://earth.esa.int/images/INSI/IIB/ERS1_32466_ERS2_12793_333_621/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by daveHe</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-400</link>
		<author>daveHe</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:41:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Greate job !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greate job !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by IgorCarron</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-399</link>
		<author>IgorCarron</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 15:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-399</guid>
		<description>Jeff and Maria:

I did some eyeball comparison based on the Radarsat data which because the cloud situation I think are a good starting point (just my point of view)
http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-approximate-data.html

Igor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff and Maria:</p>
<p>I did some eyeball comparison based on the Radarsat data which because the cloud situation I think are a good starting point (just my point of view)<br />
<a href="http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-approximate-data.html" rel="nofollow">http://nuit-blanche.blogspot.com/2007/02/finding-jim-gray-approximate-data.html</a></p>
<p>Igor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by IgorCarron</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-397</link>
		<author>IgorCarron</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 13:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-397</guid>
		<description>Jeff and Maria:

Can you please make available the gps coordinates of each of these crosses with time ?

Thanks,

Igor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff and Maria:</p>
<p>Can you please make available the gps coordinates of each of these crosses with time ?</p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Igor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Animation of Ocean Models by Monty</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-395</link>
		<author>Monty</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 05:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=200#comment-395</guid>
		<description>Wow.  That is very impressive.  Hopefully you can get someone to go out there and look now.  Keep up the amazing work...here's to hoping he's still on his boat eating canned goods.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  That is very impressive.  Hopefully you can get someone to go out there and look now.  Keep up the amazing work&#8230;here&#8217;s to hoping he&#8217;s still on his boat eating canned goods.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Are we missing a search vector? by garrett caldwell</title>
		<link>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=67#comment-391</link>
		<author>garrett caldwell</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Feb 2007 07:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://openphi.net/tenacious/?p=67#comment-391</guid>
		<description>I e-mailed the coast guard the Tuesday after he was reported missing with the vector including aprox Lat/Long where his vessel would be Wednesday at 1030 hours if auto was driving and he was on a northern rounding aproach, estamating wind and currents for the previous 48 hours. I had no response. My estamate was 457 nautical miles west nor west of S.F. Garrett</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I e-mailed the coast guard the Tuesday after he was reported missing with the vector including aprox Lat/Long where his vessel would be Wednesday at 1030 hours if auto was driving and he was on a northern rounding aproach, estamating wind and currents for the previous 48 hours. I had no response. My estamate was 457 nautical miles west nor west of S.F. Garrett</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
